Gay Marriage vs. the Bible Essay Example

Gay Marriage vs. the Bible Essay Example Gay Marriage vs. the Bible Essay Gay Marriage vs. the Bible Essay Essay Topic: The Bible The article is called Our Mutual Joy in Newsweek magazine. The article is about gay marriage in our society vs. what the bible has to say about it. The argument that the bible never directly says gay marriage should be outlawed but it does say that marriage should be between a man and a woman. What the argument was is that the bible has since been since revised to modern belief and practices where some things have been changed like sacrifices and haircuts devoted to god. Time has changed and so should the laws governing marriage. The scripture has been broken down by different people and put up against their views, one man named Neil Elliot says that when Paul states that male sex is perverted and should not be, what he was really talking about was the Romans in his time that where doing all bad things not just gay sex. Times have changed and thing like slavery is barbaric and unjust, likewise new marriage laws should be put in place to be congruent with the new age life style. Some said that in the bible the story of King David and his friend Jonathon prove that gay relations are not banned in the bible, and the conservatives then said that story was about a platonic relationship between two men. The author feels like what really matters in life is a stable home, friends, family and what happens in a bedroom really doesn’t matter in the big picture. I think that this idea of same sex marriage is viewed differently between religious and political people. : With the religious person they see it as a threat to their life style and something that may wrongly influence their later generations and will also break traditions, whereas political people wouldn’t have a problem with same sex marriage since its all money and taxes anyways. The political view might say that what happens between two people is their own business and no one else has the right to interfere. Really though I feel the religious just feel threatened that there is â€Å"unclean’ people walking among them, because really, if they are religious and care about others and don’t push their views on others then why should they care, it seems more like a paranoia or superstition. I would rather have a world with people free to be themselves, you can’t control what someone else does and I don’t think it’s even right to try. So for me this article is interesting in the fact that the religious extremists care too much about everyone else that they feel like they need to set laws in place to control them. Again I feel like the religous are just threatened and feel like they’re ways are becoming out of date so to speak. I did feel like the author was a little bias on the side of freedom of choice or the gays. In the closing statement he said what others do in the privacy of their own home is their own business. He also states that Jesus wouldn’t want someone to be lonely and sad; I agree and feel people are hurting more than helping by trying to ban gay marriage. This might sway an unknowing reader in the way of gay marriage and if they are religious, may have them questioning their own beliefs and what they actually stand for, not to mention who they are hurting. In conclusion I think this article may help contemporize religion because there are a lot of beliefs that may hurt others that don’t even need to be. Gay rights for one, as well as the idea of marriage all together and the fact that a man and woman must stay together and divorce is seen as unholy, so would god want men and women in awful relationships are unhappy just to please this request. We live in a age now where ones opinions and decisions are solely based on what that person desires from life, to limit people to who they can love and whether it be legal or not is not the decision of anyone else but that person themselves.